Skip to main content

Not a Typical Movie Review

 We were assigned with the task of watching a movie and understand its educational implications. I had  chosen the movie 'Dead Poets Society (1989)' directed by Peter Weir starring the late Robin Williams. I'd seen this movie a while ago but this time, I decided to watch it to understand what makes John Keating different from other teachers.


This Academy award winning movie is set in a conservative boy's boarding school named Welton's Academy which is known for churning out disciplined and academically brilliant students. The story focuses on a group of seventeen year old boys and their English teacher John Keating (Robin Williams). John Keating is a nonconformist and lives by the phrase 'Carpe Diem' which means 'seize the day'. He encourages his students to get rid of their fears, find their voices and live their lives to the fullest through poetry. Their newfound interest in poetry led them to create a secret club named Dead Poets Society.

One of the most fascinating things about this movie is its apt depiction of a classroom. The creators have managed to focus on each student in the class and shows how Mr. Keating guides each one of them. The writer mainly draws our attention to the diametrically opposite characters Neil Perry and Todd Anderson. Neil Perry is one of the most promising students in the academy and is stuck between fulfilling his father's dream of him becoming a doctor and his ambition to become an actor. While Todd is an introvert and needs to come out of his shell. Each audience member will surely able to connect with at least one of the characters in the movie.     

But in my second watch I decided to concentrate on Mr. Keating. He doesn't confine his classes to the four walls of a classroom. The movie effectively brings out the contrast between the classes by John Keating and the other faculty members. Mr. Keating employs a number of methods to invoke the student's interest in his subject. He engages each and everyone in the class. He doesn't shoot down students with different ideas but encourages them. He emphasizes on the idea of  'sucking the marrow out of life' but at the same time warns them not to 'choke on the bone'. 

The movie is a reservoir of amazing quotes and I suggest this movie to anyone whose feeling a little low in life.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Prime Numbers in Nature

 Prime numbers are one of the easiest concepts to understand and learn in Maths. But some of the complex problems in Maths belong to this branch. Never would have imagined an application of prime numbers in nature. Thanks to the book 'Weird Maths: At The Edge of Infinity and Beyond' which introduced me to this along with other weird applications of Maths. There's a particular species type of cicadas found in the US called the Magicicada or the 'periodical cicadas' who stay in their larva for 13 or 17 years. Imagine staying inside for over a decade with no connection to the outside world and coming out in the year 2021. People wearing masks walking all around you, smartphones, oh, the shock!🤯 It is the primality of these numbers which interest the mathematicians. The reasons are quite interesting. As the lifecycle of the prey changes, the population cycle (pattern in the population for a period of time) of their predators also vary due to the change in the availabil...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Story of Probability

 Why was the concept of probability invented? This is the question we are going to answer through this post. Probability was discovered to answer a gambling problem. The original problem is a bit complicated but the simplified version goes like this.  Suppose two persons, A and B are playing a game of coin toss where the person who gets their toss thrice first wins a pot of gold. If the score is 2-1 and the game has to be stopped due to some unforeseeable reasons then how would the pot of gold be divided?  By logic, since A is leading with 2 points and B only has 1 point, the pot can be divided in the ratio of 2:1 . This seems like a good argument but this fails when the score is 0-1. In this case, it seems unfair to give the pot of gold to B based on the previous argument when A may have a chance to win in the upcoming tosses. But if one were to calculate the probability of winning the game of the two players, then it would give us a foolproof explanation as to how...
Post a Comment
Read more